Legal Opinion

Galfand v. Chestnutt

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1973No. Civ. A. 73-1516PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRODERICK, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the defendants to transfer the above-captioned case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The complaint in this shareholder derivative action filed on July 6, 1973 alleges that the defendants, George Chestnutt and Chestnutt Corporation, the defendant Fund’s investment advisor, have entered into a self-dealing investment advisory agreement which is unfair to the shareholders of the defendant Fund. The complaint also alleges that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clendenin v. United Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Wibau, Westdeutsche Industrie Und Strassenbaumachinengesellschaft v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Biedrzycki v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Harris v. AMERICAN INVESTMENT COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Triangle Industries, Inc. v. Kennecott Copper Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galfand v. Chestnutt Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Poncy v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1976
  3. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. BosemerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Bolton v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Galfand v. ChestnuttDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API