Legal Opinion

Ramon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1934No. 16972Published

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

for perjury; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The facts in this case seem amply sufficient to support the conviction.

Appellant has two bills of exception complaining of testimony given before the trial jury of statements made to him *243by the district attorney while appellant was a witness before the grand jury. The perjury laid is based on false statements made before the grand jury.

In his able brief appellant argues at length the impropriety .of said testimony, and a discussion of the question might be of interest, — but our attention is attracted by the fact that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Spicer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Tindale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API