Barno v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:
{¶ 1} Patrick Barno ("Barno") appeals from the trial court's affirming the denial of his application for unemployment benefits in this administrative appeal and assigns the following errors for our review:
I. The Review Commission Hearing Officer's Decision is unlawful because it either ignored or misstated the law of Ohio on a number of important issues.
II. The Decision of the Review Commission is erroneous in that it is unreasonable and against the manifest weight of the evidence.
{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we reverse the decision and remand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Peyton v. Sun T v. & AppliancesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- King v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Belle Tire Distribs., Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wheeler v. NN Metal Stampings, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Barno v. Dir., Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018