Legal Opinion

Worsham v. McCall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 35,944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

North, J.

This case is before us on rehearing. Former decision is reported in 259 Mich. 630. The sole relief sought by plaintiff in his bill of complaint is specific performance. For reasons stated in our former opinion plaintiff was not entitled to the relief prayed. However, upon further consideration incident to this rehearing, we are of the opinion that by affirming the decree entered in the circuit court dismissing the bill of complaint on condition defendant would lay a sidewalk and gravel the street in front of plaintiff’s lot, an inequitable result was accomplished, unless…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worsham v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. LundyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API