Legal Opinion

Savino v. Lindsay

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold G. Fraiman, J.

Petitioners in this special proceeding seek, in essence, an order directing the Mayor, the Comptroller and the Director of the city’s Department of Personnel to discharge some 30,000 provisional and temporary city employees, whom they claim are illegally on the payroll, and to replace them with civil service employees. Respondents move to dismiss the petition for lack of standing to sue and legal insufficiency, and petitioners cross-move for disclosure as an aid in bringing this proceeding.

Petitioners allege in their petition that they are taxpayers. However, they omit any factual showing to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. People Ex Rel. Lehmaier v. Interurban Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Food Mart Associates, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meehan v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Lubkemeier v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Flynn v. New York City Police Department Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API