Louchheim v. Richmond Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 228, Oct. T., 1900, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 205, making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Walter C. Louchheim v. Richmond Mutual Building & Loan Association. Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 228, Oct. T., 1900, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 205, making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Walter C. Louchheim v. Richmond Mutual Building & Loan Association. Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense. From the record it appeared that this was a suit in assumpsit in which the plaintiff claimed that he had purchased five shares of stock of the building association, which had been running for a period of sixty months, on which he had paid $300, and that he…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
The plaintiff’s statement sets forth a claim for $421.87, with interest from July 9, 1900, the withdrawal value of five shares of the capital stock of the defendant association which had been purchased from and purchase money paid to Benjamin F. Houseman, defendant’s secretary, by the plaintiff, the withdrawal value of the shares being fixed by the provisions of the by-laws of the defendant association fully set out in the statement. The defendant admits that B. F. Houseman was its secretary at the time the money was paid ; avers further “ that the said association does…
2Cases cited1 opinion
3Cited by1 opinion
- Louchheim v. Somerset Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904