Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2008No. 07-2440PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Circuit Judge.
Hubert Bradley (Bradley) appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq. (Act). After a hearing on January 28, 2005, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found Bradley was not disabled as defined by the Act and, thus, not entitled to Social Security benefits. The appeals council denied review. The district court affirmed, and we agree.
I. DISCUSSION
We review de novo the district court’s decision affirming the ALJ’s denial of benefits. See Travis v. Astrue,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Mark S. Guilliams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Joanne M. Hacker v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Sharon Travis v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Laura Nicola v. Michael J. Astrue, 1 Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- Marcus Hensley v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Buckner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Wildman v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Kathleen J. Papesh v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Donald Fentress v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.