Legal Opinion

Kueker v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1912No. 17,405PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

w. H. Kueker and wife were, in February, 1905, the legal owners of the land in controversy, and at that time they executed a mortgage thereon in the sum' of $650 to secure the payment of a promissory note to Daniel Murphy and wife, the appellants in the case. There was a default in the payment of the note, and on April 7, 1908, Murphy secured a judgment for $773.43 and the foreclosure.of the mortgage, and, later, in a sale, Murphy bid in the property at $200, the highest and best bid offered. The court, in. *333the order of sale, allowed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. KahrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Clark v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McFall v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Garber v. Bankers' Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1928
  3. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. RobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. The Peoples State Bank of Ellinwood, Kansas, and Marian Isern v. Marlette Coach CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Trinkle v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API