Legal Opinion

Letz v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 16, 1941No. Docket No. 99940Published

Petitioner's decedent was president of the X corporation from 1930 until his death in February 1936. X made a practice of paying part of its officers' salaries in cash and giving them negotiable demand notes for the balance, taking as deductions from its income the entire amount of such salaries. This practice coincided with the wishes of its officers, who considered these notes the best investments they could make. X was solvent and the notes were worth their face amount.

Read the full summary

Petitioner's decedent was president of the X corporation from 1930 until his death in February 1936. X made a practice of paying part of its officers' salaries in cash and giving them negotiable demand notes for the balance, taking as deductions from its income the entire amount of such salaries. This practice coincided with the wishes of its officers, who considered these notes the best investments they could make. X was solvent and the notes were worth their face amount. Decedent received notes of X during the years 1930 to 1935, inclusive. He reported two of these notes as income, but did…

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF GEORGE H. LETZ, SR., DECEASED, GEORGE H. LETZ, JR., EXECUTOR, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE RESPONDENT.

Letz v. Commissioner

Docket No. 99940.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

45 B.T.A. 1011; 1941 BTA LEXIS 1040;

December 16, 1941, Promulgated

Petitioner's decedent was president of the X corporation from 1930 until his death in February 1936. X made a practice of paying part of its officers' salaries in cash and giving them negotiable demand notes for the balance, taking as deductions from its income the entire amount of such salaries. This practice coincided with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Letz v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API