Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Novak

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2006No. 2006-0080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Lawrence J. Novak of Lancaster, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039794, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988.

{¶ 2} On May 27, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent in an amended four-count complaint with professional misconduct. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause, including the parties’ comprehensive stipulations, respondent’s testimony, and the testimony of respondent’s psychotherapist. The panel made findings of misconduct, which the board adopted, and a recommendation, which the board…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. GlaeserOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. NovakOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API