Legal Opinion

People v. Mora & Rangel

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2018No. S079925PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUÉLLAR, J.

*450 This automatic appeal arises from defendants Joseph Adam Mora and Ruben Rangel's 1999 convictions and death sentences for the *451 attempted robberies and murders of Andres Encinas and Antonio Urrutia. Mora and Rangel contend that several errors occurred during the guilt and penalty phases of their trial. With one exception, we disagree. The exception consists of a guilt phase instructional error permitting the jury to find the multiple murder special circumstance true without finding that Mora or Rangel intended to kill or actually killed either victim. We nonetheless find the error…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. FayedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. People v. MoralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  4. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API