Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The defendant has one assignment of error: the failure of the Trial Judge to allow his written motion to set aside the verdict. The defendant has not excepted to the finding of fact of the court that the defendant has not shown that he was in any wise prejudiced by said occurrence. It is hard to conceive that the defendant would have said anything to his hurt in his conversation with juror Tippett. What was said in the conversation does not appear. The evidence supports the finding. To obtain a new trial, it is not sufficient to show error, but the defendant must show that his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . DegraffenreidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State v. . TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. State v. SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API