Legal Opinion

Suter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1978No. M-77-578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNISH, Judge:

Teresa Suter has appealed to this Court from an order of the District Court, Oklahoma County, adjudging her to be in contempt. In her appeal she argues, among other things, that she was denied due process of law through the refusal of the judge to allow her to call witnesses on her behalf or to allow her attorney to make a closing argument. After reviewing the record of the proceedings, we are of the opinion that this case must be remanded for a new hearing.

I

Article II, § 25, of the Oklahoma Constitution provides that no punishment for contempt may be imposed until the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Smith v. State Ex Rel. RaburnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Nuckols v. Van WagnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Minter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. D.M. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Nakell v. Attorney General Of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API