Legal Opinion

Urschel v. Hannin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1927No. 1758PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The Lucas Common Pleas quashed service of summons upon M. P. Hannin upon the ground that he had been enticed into the jurisdiction of the court and service obtained. Hannin was a resident of California and he came into this jurisdiction soon after receiving the following Isttsr*

“Mr. M. P. Hannin,

4373 South Van Ness Ave.,

Los Angeles, Calif.

My dear Mike:—

When you were last in Toledo, I believe you mentioned that you would be willing to talk business with me relative to the Lime Products Company which is under your control in Los Angeles.

We are quite anxious that this matter be cleared up, owing…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uthoff v. DubrieOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. MacKey v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API