Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lindsey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 2007No. AP-75,417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The applicant in this case contends that he has been erroneously deemed ineligible for mandatory supervision. He also contends that he has been improperly denied “street-time” credit. We will grant relief as to his mandatory supervision claim and deny it as to his street-time claim.

Mandatory Supervision

The applicant was convicted in 1997 of aggravated assault 1 and burglary of a habitation 2 and sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary. In 2003, he was released to mandatory supervision, but it was later revoked, and the applicant was returned to prison. In 2005, the Department of Criminal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte ColemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philip J. Pohl v. Brad Livingston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. Philip J. Pohl v. Brad Livingston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API