Legal Opinion
Oszust v. Town of St. John
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided August 30, 2016No. Case No. 2:15-CV-339 JDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JON E. DEGUILIO, United States District Judge
In this case, police officer David Oszust alleges that the Town of St. John, Indiana (the Town) retaliated against him for engaging in activity protected by Title VII. Further, he alleges that the Town’s Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners (the Board) commenced disciplinary proceedings against him that do not comply with Indiana Code § 36-8-3-4 (which governs police board disciplinary proceedings) 1 and will force him to disclose his medical records in violation of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.2 He…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Britton v. South Bend City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Victoria Guster-Hines and Domineca Neal v. McDonald's USA, LLC, McDonald's Corporation, Steven Easterbrook, Christopher Kempczinski, and Charles StrongDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Williams v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Williams v. Whitley Memorial Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Parkview Warsaw Medical ComplexDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023