Legal Opinion

Hardy Street Investors v. Texas Water Rights Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1976No. 5521PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of an administrative body, involving the substantial evidence rule.

Plaintiff-Appellants Hardy Street Investors, a partnership, and Kingsbridge Development Corporation challenged an order of Defendant-Appellee Texas Water Rights Commission as being invalid and void because it was not supported by substantial evidence. After review of the facts, the trial court’s judgment upheld the validity of the order, from which Plaintiff-Appellants appeal. We affirm.

Inverness Forest Improvement District (hereinafter called “District”) applied to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Southern Canal Co. v. State Board of Water EngineersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. City of San Antonio v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Marrs v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United Savings Ass'n of Texas v. VandygriffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. State Banking Board v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. TEX. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COM'N v. WishnowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. TEXAS HEALTH FAC. COMM'N v. Baptist Gen. ConventionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Kittman v. St Bd. of Pharmacy of TxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API