Legal Opinion

People v. Contreras

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1993No. 1-92-0951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Following a bench trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant was convicted of residential burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 19 — 3), then sentenced as a Class X offender (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 1005 — 5—3(c)(8)) to a term of nine years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant contends that his sentence must be vacated because the State did not provide him notice in the charging instrument that it would seek an enhanced sentence upon conviction.

The evidence adduced at trial showed that defendant was identified as one of two men who were apprehended at the scene of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. NichollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Maloney v. BowerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. JamesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. ColeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. People v. NewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. People v. LucasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API