Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 13, 2006No. A06A0822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Convicted of armed robbery and hijacking a motor vehicle, Corey Smith appeals from the sentence entered by the trial court. He contends that the court failed to exercise its discretion when it imposed a consecutive sentence for the hijacking count. We agree, vacate Smith’s sentence, and remand the case for resentencing.

A jury found Smith guilty of armed robbery and hijacking a motor vehicle for taking at gunpoint the victim’s car, money, and other items. During sentencing, the trial judge stated:

Count two involves a hijacking of a motor vehicle. I have read the statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Blevins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Law v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Hwang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API