Smith v. City of Nogales
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This appeal is prosecuted from an order granting the plaintiff-appellee a new trial. We are compelled to resort to the abstract of the evidence to find the facts, since counsel have completely ignored the rule of the court requiring them to set forth in their brief “a concise statement of the ease, presenting succinctly the questions involved and the manner in which they are arranged. ’ ’ Buie 7, § 2, Buies of the Supreme Court. The observance of this rule is absolutely necessary to an understanding of the assignments of error and the argument of counsel to follow. The frequency with which it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leeker v. LeekerArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Chenoweth v. PrewettArizona Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clemens v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Vazzano v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Blair v. BlairArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Zugsmith v. MullinsArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.