Legal Opinion

Baliles v. Mazur

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 3, 1982No. Record 821123PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The Attorney General, by filing a petition for a writ of mandamus, invokes our original jurisdiction pursuant to Code § 8.01-653, 1 seeking adjudication as to the constitutionality of certain provisions of the “Virginia Public Building Authority Act of nineteen hundred eighty-one” (the Act). Acts 1981, c. 569; Code §§ 2.1-234.10 to -234.19.

On June 25, 1982, the Comptroller of Virginia (Comptroller) notified the Attorney General of doubts respecting the constitutionality, proper construction, and interpretation of the Act and raised certain questions for consideration by this court. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Enourato v. New Jersey Building AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Almond v. GilmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. Winchester & Strasburg Railroad v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  4. Harrison v. DaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  5. Infants v. Virginia Housing Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Department of Ecology v. State Finance CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Taylor v. Worrell Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  5. Wayne County Citizens Ass'n for Better Tax Control: Outlaw v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API