Moore v. State
Court of Claims of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtRoe, C. J.
Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State of Illinois is liable as a bailee for the return of that property. This court has held in Doubling v. State, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1, that the State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodson v. HareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc. v. Citizens InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Doubling v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1976
- Bargas v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1976
- Bell v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1985
- Owens v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1985
- Harris v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989
- Holland v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.