Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marguerite Hiken v. Department of Defense

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 6, 2016No. 13-17073Published

1DissentRawlinson, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent for two reasons: 1) Military Law Task Force (Task Force) failed to appeal the district court’s fee award; and 2) the district court acted within its discretion in calculating the fee award.

1. Task Force failed to appeal the district court’s fee award.

As the majority candidly acknowledges, the “notice of appeal is plainly deficient.” Majority Opinion, p. 1043. Specifically, Task Force’s notice of appeal contained absolutely no mention of the underlying fee award. Rather, it referenced only the district court’s denial of the motion for reconsideration.

The majority relies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lolli v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. McCarthy v. MayoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Henry AnekwuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Zixiang Li v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Curtis A. Belgarde, United States of America v. Curtis A. BelgardeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API