Legal Opinion

Hootnick v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We reject petitioner’s contention that Family Court erred in dismissing his petition to terminate his child support obligation without conducting an evidentiary hearing. A hearing is not required unless the application is supported by an affidavit or other evidentiary materials sufficient to establish a prima facie case for the relief requested (Family Ct Act § 451). The relief requested by petitioner was termination of his child support obligation on the ground that his three children had abandoned him. We conclude that petitioner failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stern v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Ardito v. ArditoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Mulligan v. MulliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Mulligan v. MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. COLEMAN, MARK D. v. MURPHY, MAUREEN M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Kelly v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API