Wycoff v. Longhead
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
THIS was an a action on a promissory note; to which the defendant pleaded the act of Assembly against usury; and thereupon the following points were ruled by the Court, in their charge to the Jury.
1st. That where more than leg I interest was included in any note, bond, or specialty, the whole amount could not be sued for and recovered: But the plaintiff was entitled, in such case, to a verdict for the just principal and lawful interest.
2d. That if a man, directly, or indirectly, actually receives more than fix per cent, he incurs a forfeiture equal to the money &c. lent; but if an action is…
2Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Griffith v. RefordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
- Lloyd v. KeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
- Musgrove v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1787
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.