Legal Opinion

United States v. Segal

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 6, 2004No. 1:02-mc-00112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

A jury found Defendant Michael Segal guilty of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68. The jury also found that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1963(a)(1) and (3), Segal must forfeit $30 million in racketeering proceeds and interests and that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a)(2), 60% of his interest in Near North Insurance Brokerage (“NNIB”) or Near North National Group (“NNNG”) (collectively “the enterprise”) was criminally tainted and, therefore, subject to forfeiture. This Court then…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SegalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. PetersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  3. Patrick v. ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API