Lustgarten v. Harlam
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of IS! ew York, granting a motion for a compulsory reference.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff made a motion for a compulsory reference, upon the ground that the trial of the issues would involve the examination of a long account and that no difficult or intricate question of law would arise on the trial. This motion was granted, and, from the order granting the same, defendant appeals. The complaint sets forth that plaintiff, as a physician, rendered services to defendant’s wife between May 18, 1906, and March 1, 1907, and that for said services defendant promised and agreed to pay to plaintiff the sum of $1,455, which was, according to the complaint, the reasonable value of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Camp v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Hedges v. Methodist Protestant ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Prentice v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Aronin v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907