Legal Opinion

In re Bigman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this proceeding, the respondents were charged with nine allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained all charges except Charge Seven, which had been withdrawn. The petitioner moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report while the respondents cross-move to disaffirm the report, to suspend all proceedings in this matter, and to direct that a full hearing be held as to the issues raised in the disciplinary complaint.

Charge One alleged that the respondents engaged in conduct that adversely reflects upon their fitness to practice law. John Yakub and…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re BigmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re BigmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API