Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Franklin Corp.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 21, 2009No. 2008-WC-00858-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, P.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. Ruth Wooten filed a petition to controvert alleging that she developed carpel tunnel syndrome as a result of her work at Franklin Corporation (Franklin). A hearing on the merits was conducted by the administrative law judge (ALJ), who ruled that Wooten was not entitled to permanent disability benefits. Wooten appealed this decision to the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission), which affirmed the decision of the ALJ. Wooten then appealed the Commission’s decision to the Chickasaw County Circuit Court, which affirmed the Commission’s decision.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. AdenMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Meridian Professional Baseball Club v. JensenMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hardaway Co. v. BradleyMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bracey v. Packard Elec. Div., General Motors Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Daniels v. Peco Foods of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forrest County General Hospital v. Felicia KnightCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2025
  2. Moeller v. Mississippi Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API