Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Sucro

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1939No. 4384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H, II. WATKINS, District Judge.

This'action for the trial of title to land was instituted by appellee against appellants, who were therein and will be hereinafter respectively designated as plaintiff and defendants. The case was docketed at law and tried as an action in ejectment pursuant to the North Carolina practice. This is the second appeal. Upon the first trial defendants demanded that the case be submitted to a jury, but this was refused and the case referred to a special master, upon whose report the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Appeal was taken upon several…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Garrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Sucro v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API