Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 2008No. 40A01-0707-CR-343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

RILEY, Judge.

Appellant-Defendant, Leslie Miller (Miller), petitions for rehearing, asking us to revisit his sentence for three counts of child molesting, one Class A felony and two Class C felonies, Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3, in light of the trial court’s “Order Clarifying Sentence,” which the trial court entered sua sponte after we issued our original opinion. Because Miller’s sentence, as clarified by the trial court, violates the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh’g denied, we are bound to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Trusley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hightower v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API