Legal Opinion

Piermann v. Piermann's Guardian

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Carroll—

Affirming.

Jacob Piermann, died in 1912 the owner of the fee in two separate small parcels of land. He left surviving him his wife and three adult children, and two grandchildren, the issue of his deceased son, William-Piermann, who died before the testator. One of these children is over fourteen years, the other under.

In his will the testator devised all of his land to his wife for life and after her death he directed that it should be divided equally between his children.

This suit was brought by the widow and adult children against the two infant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatterich v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Fullenwider v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. VanMeter v. VanMeterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Walton Bank & Trust Co. v. GlinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cammack v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Miracle v. MiracleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Charboneau v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Whitney v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Korb v. StegeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API