Legal Opinion
State v. McKenney
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 24, 1958No. 6 Div. 30PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
The single question in this case is whether or not the appellee is a “merchandise broker” within the meaning of § 493 of Title 51, Code 1940, which was amended by Act No. 418, approved July 12, 1943, to read as follows:
“Each commission merchant or merchandise broker shall pay one State license of Twenty-five ($25.00) Dollars and one county license of Twelve and 50/100 ($12.50) Dollars. Such payment shall be made in the county in which such commission merchant or merchandise broker maintains his principal place of business. Such license shall authorize such commission merchant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stratford v. City Council of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Esco v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- United States Steel Corporation v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. KinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Brown v. LucasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.