Legal Opinion

Tetterton v. Foggie

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1970No. 19017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice.

Howard L. Tetterton, by his guardian ad litem, the respondent herein, instituted this action against Cardell Foggie, the appellant herein, to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have resulted from the actionable negligence of the appellant in the operation of his automobile. Mrs. Della Mae Tetterton Cato, the mother of Howard L. Tetterton, also a respondent herein, instituted an action against the appellant to recover medical expenses incurred by her for the care and treatment of her minor son, which she alleges resulted from the actionable negligence of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Carter v. BealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. Herring v. BoydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lundy v. Palmetto State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Eden W. ex rel. Evans v. TarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API