Legal Opinion

Bank of Rome v. . Village of Rome

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1859PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question whether the act passed May 27th, 1853 (ch. 283), conferring power upon the defendant to subscribe for stock in the Ogdensburgh, Clayton and Rome Railroad Company is constitutional and valid, was decided by this court between these same parties against the defendant, at the last September term (18 N.Y., 33), and no question upon this ground is now made; nor upon the approval of the act by the electors of the village of Rome, pursuant to the 9th and 10th sections. The plaintiff, upon the trial, introduced in evidence the certificate of the Commissioners of the Railroad Fund of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murdock v. . GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Starin v. . the Town of GenoaNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. People Ex Rel. Fiedler v. MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Cagwin v. . Town of HancockNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Thompson v. PerrineSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Town of Solon v. Williamsburgh Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API