Legal Opinion · Dissent
Fortune Insurance Co. v. Matos
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 25, 1995No. 94-04005Published
1DissentAltenbernd, Judge
I admit that the line drawn in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91 (Fla.1995), between discovery that results in irreparable harm and that which does not is confusing to me. Nevertheless, I conclude that the improper discovery in this case results in a type of harm that cannot be adequately redressed in any subsequent plenary appeal. Fortune Insurance Company (Fortune) has established that we have jurisdiction for certiorari review in this case. See Parkway Bank v. Fort Myers Armature Works, Inc., 658 So.2d 646 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Because the order compelling production of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Parkway Bank v. FORT MYERS ARMATURE WORKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Pearlstein v. MalunneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Pearce v. Doral Mobile Home Villas, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Cohen v. DeYoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995