Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1941No. 34,559Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWedell, J.

I concur in the majority opinion touching the two items of damage which pertain to exploration and development of the Viola formation and to the conversion of the gas well into a combination oil and gas well. I do not agree with the majority opinion touching exploration and development of the Chat formation.

Before discussing the latter question I desire to state briefly my personal views relative to the alleged failure to convert the gas well into a combination oil and gas well. Accurately speaking, it seems to me the subject of converting the gas well did not really involve the question of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API