Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWedell, J.
I concur in the majority opinion touching the two items of damage which pertain to exploration and development of the Viola formation and to the conversion of the gas well into a combination oil and gas well. I do not agree with the majority opinion touching exploration and development of the Chat formation.
Before discussing the latter question I desire to state briefly my personal views relative to the alleged failure to convert the gas well into a combination oil and gas well. Accurately speaking, it seems to me the subject of converting the gas well did not really involve the question of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.