Legal Opinion

State v. Fore

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1933No. 3753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

Oran Pore and Jonas De Arman were convicted of the crime of robbery with dangerous weapons, and sentenced to the penitentiary. Prom the judgment and sentences they prosecute this appeal.

There is no controversy in regard to the commission of the offense. The material question upon which appellants’ learned counsel, who did not try the case below, bases points for reversal, is in respect to the identity of the persons perpetrating the crime.

On the night of December 22, 1929, a poker game was being held in a house in the town of Alamogordo. It had been in progress for four or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. State v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Commonwealth v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. QuintanaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API