Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Hutchinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1936No. 26299. En BancPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Relator, by this action, seeks to compel the respondent, as secretary of state, to accept and file his declaration of candidacy for the office of state senator for the thirty-eighth district.

In his petition, the relator sets forth that Honorable L. E. Tewksbury, the incumbent for the term ending the second Monday in January, 1939, has accepted the position of district administrator of the Works Progress Administration, in which position he is the representative of the Federal government, and that, under the terms of Art. II, § 14, of our state constitution, the acceptance of the Federal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Nelson v. TroyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bilger v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Board of Directors of School District No. 306 v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State Ex Rel. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Haskins v. State Ex Rel. HarringtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Hamblen v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hsieh v. Civil Service Commission of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Brown v. BlewWashington Supreme Court · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API