Legal Opinion

EMC Iron Works, Inc. v. Regal Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*367Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered April 2, 2003, which denied nonparty appellant’s motion to determine and fix the amount of his charging lien under Judiciary Law § 475, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

An attorney discharged for cause is not entitled to compensation (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 44 [1990]; Shalom Toy v Each & Every One of Members of N.Y. Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 239 AD2d 196, 198 [1997]). Appellant’s filing of mechanics’ liens against the City instead of public improvement hens resulted in the dismissal of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. S & D Petroleum Co. v. TamsettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Shalom Toy, Inc. v. Each & Every One of the Members of the New York Property Insurance Underwritting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brill & Meisel v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Brill & Meisel v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API