Legal Opinion

Chapman v. White Sewing Machine Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM the chancery court, second district, of Hinds county. Hon. Henry C. Conn, Chancellor. The Sewing Machine Co., appellee, was the complainant in the court below. The facts are stated in the previous report (76 Miss., 821), to wliicb reference is made. Tbe opinion now reported shows how the case came before the court a second time. [A synopsis of the briefs of counsel on both sides is given in the former report of tbe case, 76 Miss., page 822.]

1Opinion of the Court

Whitfield,, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

After the delivery of the opinion in this case found in 76 Miss., 821, and after a suggestion of error therein had been overruled, it was ascertained that at the time of the rendition of the jdgment W. C. Chapman was dead. The judgment was therefore vacated as void, and this case, revivor having been had, has been again presented.

The opinion in 76 Miss., supra, will be now re-entered as our opinion in this case, in all things except that the decree of the chancellor is affirmed as to the allotment of homestead.

The deed failing as to the one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. White Sewing Machine Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Callicott v. HornMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Anderson v. AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API