Legal Opinion

Mintzer v. Mintzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff served a certified copy of the final judgment and was therefore entitled to enforce the payment thereof in respect of defaults occurring prior to the service thereof. (Goldfarb v. Goldfarb, 235 App. Div. 867.) Moreover, any contention in respect thereto was waived by failure to make at Special Term any claim in relation to such a ground. (Park v. Park, 80 N. Y. 156, 161.) From the total payments due for the period from the entry of the interlocutory judgment to September 30, 1942, there should be deducted the payments for thirteen weeks preceding the entry of the final judgment,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Park v. . ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Goldfarb v. GoldfarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API