Huntley v. Oregon State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
To the writer, the questions presented on this appeal seem to be decided in the case of Dondeneau v. State Industrial Accident Commission, *187119 Or. 357 (249 P. 820, 50 A. L. R. 1129). In that case, as in the case at bar, the Commission urged that the injury was not sustained by accident. The strong dissenting opinion in the Dondeneau case, written by the late Mr. Justice Burnett, ably supports the defendants’ position in this case. The majority of the court, as then constituted, held that the claimant therein had sustained a compensable injury. Iii that case, it was shown that, sometime…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Dondeneau v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Blair v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Demagalski v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Elford v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932