Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Lenoir

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 16, 1994No. ACM 30198Published

1ConcurrenceHeimburg, Senior Judge

I agree completely with Judge Pearson’s opinion, and write separately only to add further comments about the law of sentencing in multiple offense convictions.

It is entirely appropriate that the lead opinion speaks of “cumulative punishments” and avoids the unfortunate term “sentence multiplicity.” A careful reading of Supreme Court precedents leads me to conclude there is only one stream of constitutional case law on multiplicity, not two. The law of multiplicity has its roots in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment (“nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. BeaudinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API