Bryant v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
187 S.W.3d 397 (2005)
Clarence Randolph BRYANT, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas.
No. PD-672-04.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 6, 2005.
Stan Schwieger, Waco, for appellant.
Jeffrey L. Van Horn, First Assistant State's Attorney, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
Before his trial for driving while intoxicated, Clarence Randolph Bryant stipulated to two prior DWI convictions. The State agreed to the stipulation, but the stipulation was not admitted into evidence. On appeal, Bryant argued that the evidence was insufficient to convict because the State failed to offer…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brito Carrasco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.