Ingles v. . Donalson
Superior Court of North Carolina
'V'ROVER for a Negro named Casar; not guilty, and upon the evidence the case appeared to be thus: That the Negro formerly belonged to Murray, who in the county court of Edg-combe, at November term, in the year 1792, confessed judgment to Garner for the sum of forty pounds or thereabouts, upon which judgment and execution issued, tested 27th November, 1792. — . On the first day of December, in the year 1792, another execu-tlou, but of what date did. not appear, upon a…
Read the full summary
'V'ROVER for a Negro named Casar; not guilty, and upon the evidence the case appeared to be thus: That the Negro formerly belonged to Murray, who in the county court of Edg-combe, at November term, in the year 1792, confessed judgment to Garner for the sum of forty pounds or thereabouts, upon which judgment and execution issued, tested 27th November, 1792. — . On the first day of December, in the year 1792, another execu-tlou, but of what date did. not appear, upon a judgment before ft Justice of Peace, at the instance of another plaintiff, was in the funds of Jewell, a constable, who on that…
1Opinion of the Court
Et per Curtain -Haywood, Justice in the court.
-The first thing tobe observed upon is the execution upon Garaer’s judgment Murray’s goods and. effects were all bound by that frota the time of its-teste,, and he could not after that teste sell or dispose thereofso as to defeat the execution., No sale made, pending the execution unsatisfied, will be good to vets the property la the vendee unless eventually the execution shall become satisfied by some other means. As to what has been said respecting the want- of possession, if it be neceosary.in the present-case to resort to .that circumstance ¡…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Darden v. . SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1815
- Gaither v. . MumfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1817