Legal Opinion

Branch v. Charlie Pike Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1991No. A90A2124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

After the sale of a repossessed automobile, appellee-plaintiff initiated this deficiency action against appellant-defendant. Appellant answered and cross-motions for summary judgment were subsequently filed. Appellant appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee.

1. Relying upon Sikes & Swanson Pontiac-GMC Truck v. Cantrell, 194 Ga. App. 818 (392 SE2d 36) (1990), appellant urges that a genuine issue of material fact remains as to the date of repossession and the timeliness of compliance with the notice requirements of OCGA § 10-1-36.

As in Cantrell, there is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bryant v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Friddell v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Sikes & Swanson Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Davis v. Concord Commercial Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Lee v. Trust Company BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Bales v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API