Branch v. Charlie Pike Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
After the sale of a repossessed automobile, appellee-plaintiff initiated this deficiency action against appellant-defendant. Appellant answered and cross-motions for summary judgment were subsequently filed. Appellant appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee.
1. Relying upon Sikes & Swanson Pontiac-GMC Truck v. Cantrell, 194 Ga. App. 818 (392 SE2d 36) (1990), appellant urges that a genuine issue of material fact remains as to the date of repossession and the timeliness of compliance with the notice requirements of OCGA § 10-1-36.
As in Cantrell, there is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bryant v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Friddell v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Sikes & Swanson Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. Concord Commercial Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Lee v. Trust Company BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Bales v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.