Legal Opinion
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL v. Seamprufe Inc.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1955No. Civ. No. 3603PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
This action was instituted by International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, AFL, a voluntary association, and Georgia Sukenis and Irving Krantz, individuals, against Seamprufe Incorporated, doing business in Holdenville, Oklahoma, and the City of Holdenville, a Municipal Corporation, to enjoin the further enforcement of a city ordinance allegedly impinging upon plaintiffs’ right of freedom of speech and hindering the peaceful distribution of union literature framed to persuade employees of Seamprufe Incorporated to join the plaintiff association’s union and thereby…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union AFL v. Seamprufe IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956