Legal Opinion

Lieberman v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1973No. Appeal, No. 343 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia here appeals a judgment entered against it in a condemnation case tried below by a judge without a jury-

*368The appellees, Irwin and Lillie Lieberman, conducted a taproom business in a premises owned by others located in center-city Philadelphia. The last written lease under which they occupied the premises was for a term of five years from November 1, 1961 with an option to renew for a further term of three years. The lease included a clause providing for its termination upon condemnation of the demised premises by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Feitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Scholl's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. CAVANAUGH v. GELDERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Saunders v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tedesco v. Municipal Authority of Hazle TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Edwards v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API