Lieberman v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia here appeals a judgment entered against it in a condemnation case tried below by a judge without a jury-
*368The appellees, Irwin and Lillie Lieberman, conducted a taproom business in a premises owned by others located in center-city Philadelphia. The last written lease under which they occupied the premises was for a term of five years from November 1, 1961 with an option to renew for a further term of three years. The lease included a clause providing for its termination upon condemnation of the demised premises by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Feitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Scholl's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- CAVANAUGH v. GELDERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Saunders v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tedesco v. Municipal Authority of Hazle TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Edwards v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974