Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Snapp

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 28, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · FranksHerschel Pickens Franks, P.J.

in which D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J. and SHARON G. LEE, JR., joined.

In this action to construe provisions in Decedent’s Will, the Trial Court applied the anti-lapse statute. On appeal, we reverse.

The Will of the Testatrix, Cleo M. Snapp, was probated on February 9, 2005, and on March 29, 2005, the Executor filed a “Declaratory Action to Interpret Will.” The dispute involves the construction of these provisions of the Will:

ITEM VII. I give, devise and bequeath to my three sisters, VIOLA SWINGLE, ANNE E. FOWLER and LENA MAE HARTSELL, my 1/4 interest in and to the Juanita Farm located in the…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Daugherty v. DaughertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McDonald v. LedfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Galloupe v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Cleo SnappCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  2. In Re: Estate of Sandra Kay ChristianCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  3. In re Estate of Lois CulpCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API